Sunday, October 21, 2012

On Iran: Open Letter to European Parliament - Signatures welcome



Response to European Parliament delegation to visit Iran on October 27, 2012

(Please scroll down for the letter in English)


An Open Letter to European Parliament - 2012 - Urgent, need your signature asap, please read
by Mansur Rastani on Friday, October 19, 2012

به امضای شما نیاز فوری است، لطفا بخوانید 
قابل توجه ایرانیان مبارز و آزادیخواه: 
اخیرا پارلمان اروپا تصمیم به اعزام یک تیم نمایندگان متشکل از ۱۵ نفر از اعضای پارلمان خود به ایران را دارد. این تیم قرار است که در ۲۷ اکتبر ۲۰۱۲ وارد ایران شود و تا ۲ نوامبر در ایران با نمایندگان مجلس و رهبران رژیم گفتگو داشته باشند. در رأس کسانی که با آنها در ایران گفگو خواند داشت، علی اکبر رفسنجانی،علی لاریجانی،  صادق لاریجانی، کاظم جلالی، و علادین بروجردی است. رییس کمیته اعزامی این بازدید را یک پل نو برای تجدید روابط  ایران و اروپا قلمداد کرده است. این کار پارلمان اروپا جزء فراهم کردن مشروعیت برای رژیم جهت حفظ منافع شان و پایمال کردن خون های ریخته شده جوانان مبارز ایرانی پیام دیگری را در بر ندارد.  این اولین بار نیست که پارلمان اروپا چنین تصمیمی را اتخاذ میکند، پارسال نیز چنین قصدی را داشتند، ولی ما به کمک ایران دوستان و بسیار دیگر از مبارزان با ارسال نامه  و جمع آوری امضا و ابراز اعتراضات خود توانستیم که در آخرین دقیقه جلوی اینکار را بگیریم. امیدواریم که امسال هم بتوانیم در متوقف کردن این پروسه ضد انسانی پیروز بیرون آییم. برای همین منظور من نامه ای را خطاب به پارلمان اروپا  تنظیم کردم که پیوست است، این نامه از پارلمان اروپا میخواهد که سفر نمایندگان اروپا به ایران را لغو نماید و بجای آنکه با رژیم جنایتکار پیوند دوستی بنا کنند به ایرانیان مبارز امید داشته باشند و به مبارزات آزادی خواهی شان کمک کنند.  آنهایی که دل در گروی وطن دارند، نام کامل (حقیقی و یا مستعار)، شغل (حرفه و یا فعالیت سیاسی و یا اجتمایی)، و کشور خود را برای این جانب ایمیل نمایند تا به لیست امضا کنندگان این نامه اضافه شوند. این نامه به زبان انگلیسی نوشته شده است.
 mansrastani@yahoo.com
or
mansurrastani@gmail.com
مثال: 
کامبیز پارسی، فعال حقوق بشر، سوئد
ایرج ایرانی، مهندس برق، کانادا 
پری آزاده، ام.دی.، پزشک اطفال ، فرانسه 

فکر میکنم مثال ها باندازه کافی روشن هستند. اگر میتوانید مشخصات خود را بزبان انگلیسی بنویسید، در غیر اینصورت من آنها را به انگلیسی برگردان خواهم کرد.  این نامه در روز یکشنبه اکتبر ۲۱  ساعت ۶ بعد از ظهر بوقت غرب امریکا به نمایندگان اعزامی پارلمان اروپا و پرزیدنت پارلمان اروپا و بعضی از اعضای آن بصورت الکترونیک ارسال خواهد شد. این زمان از این نظرکه چون تیم اعزامی پارلمان در تاریخ ۲۳ اکتبر جلسه دارد انتخاب شده است، تا زمان کافی برای مطالعه و تصمیم گیری روی درخواست ما را داشته باشند. مجددا برای ارسال نام و مشخصات خود به تاریخ ذکر شده توجه داشته باشد که موجب سپاس است. سعی خواهد شد که ترجمه فارسی این نامه را درهفته آینده بنظر ایران دوستان برسانم. 

منصور راستانی 



***************************************

Dear fellow Iranians:

Once again a delegation from European Parliament is planning to go to Iran to talk to the members of Iranian regime. 


They plan to enter Iran on October 27, 2012 and stay there until November 2nd . The delegation consists of 15 members, some of the IRI leaders they will talk to are, Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, Ali Larijani, Sadegh Larijani, Kazem Jalali, and alaeddin Boroujerdi.

The Chair of the delegation has called the visit a bridge building exercise for a new relation. This trip will provide legitimacy and publicity for the regime and will come as a huge disappointment to the tens of thousands of courageous Iranian citizens who have repeatedly risked their lives to protest against the oppression of the mullahs.

This is not the first time that European Parliament has planned for delegation’s trip to Iran, last year we had similar situation, in which with the help of our fellow Iranians and expressing our objections, the EP decided to call off the trip in the last minute. It is hoped that we could do the same this year and be able to stop their tip on time.

For this purpose, I have put together a letter, which is addressed to the members of EP delegation. This letter asks EP to stop delegation’s trip and rather to put their hope on Iranian people. Those who still are in love with Iran, and want to sign the letter, should email me (manrastani@yahoo.com, or mansurrastani@gmail.com) their name (real or alias), their profession,  and the country they live in, refer to example below.

Example:
David Johnson, Human Rights Activist, France
Nader Parsi, Ph.D., University Faculty, USA
Nasrin Irani, Electronic Engineer, Britain

The letter will be send electronically to EP delegation and EP president on October 21, 2012, at 6 pm pacific time,  so that the members of EP could discuss it during their meeting on October 23, 2012.

Thank you
Mansur Rastani



***********************************************************************

10, 21, 2012
European Parliament - The Iran Delegation,
Tarja Cronberg (Chair),  Potito Salatto (Vice Chair 1),  Comelia Ernst  (Vice Chair 2),
Members:  
Alexander Alvaro, Sergio Caetano Cofferati , Isabelle Durant, Peter Jahr, Dan Jorgensen, Marit Paulsen, Oreste Rossi, Oreste Rossi, Marco Scurria, Boguslaw Sonik, Ewald Stadler, Kathleen Van Brempt, Geoffrey Van Orden,  Josef Weidenholzer, Zalewski Pawel, and

Substitute Members:
George Cutas, Dimitrios Droutsas, Martin Ehrenhauser, Christofer Jellner, Philippe Juvin, Lena Kolarska, Barbara Lochbihler, Antonyia Parvanova, Pavel Poc, Marieje Schaake, Alda Sousa, Salvatore Tatarella, Emilie, Turunen, Niki Tzavel, Marita Ulvskog, Sabine Verhyen  

Dear Madam Chair,
Once again the oppressed Iranian people were shocked to hear an absurd report from European Parliament in regard to embarking on an official visit of their lawmakers to Iran. The question on every Iranian mind is: “How can they even think of going to Tehran at this stage of time?” It seems that there is a sever discord between European Parliament and European Union proceedings when it comes to Iran policy. On 15 October 2012, EU member States have imposed new sanctions on Iran for its reckless behavior that endangers global security, a dramatic reminder that relations with Iran cannot be business as usual. These punitive steps are meant to persuade Iran to engage constructively by addressing the concerns of the International community.  However the trip of EP delegation while basically undermines such EU’s efforts and consequently results in the detraction from their achievement of broader objectives, it would also send incongruous messages to Tehran, making the regime to callously exploit the visit for propaganda purposes. It would be paradoxical and the European Parliament should not play into the hands of Iranian regime.

Madam Chair, The report states that the visit will provide the opportunity for dialogue between the two delegations and should be regarded as a bridge building exercise.  Building bridge with a regime that has no legitimacy among its own people! After more than 3 decades, hasn’t EP learned enough yet about the conduct of the Iranian regime? The international community, including U.S., EU, UN Security Council, which has long been monitoring the situation in Iran after holding numerous meetings for diplomatic negotiations with the regime, trying carrot-and-stick policies in their conciliations, and issuing countless punitive resolutions, have reached a consensus on the following concerns regarding the behavior of the Iran’s clerical government, that the regime:

1. Is pursuing a military nuclear program,
2. Supports terrorists across the globe,
3. Intervenes in the internal affairs of its neighbors,
4. Undermines any activities for the peace movement in the region,
5. Infringes upon the freedom and human rights of its own people,
6. Disregard the right of the Iranian people to chart their own future through democratic means.

The European Parliament should know that the theocratic regime of Tehran will not change its strategy. It will neither change its support of terrorism, nor its domestic policy of violation of human rights. The Clerical Government will continue its efforts to develop nuclear weapons and handle them irresponsibly. It will continue to provide political, financial and logistical support to its proxy terror groups across the globe like Lebanon through Hezbollah in the Middle East, and in the Palestinian territories. Iranian regime is also helping Syrian government in its crackdown on pro-democracy protests. The visit of EP delegates to Iran would only provide and publicize legitimacy for the regime’s crimes and its NPT violation, and its terrorist act, and its violation of human rights.

The future of Iran will be decided by the people, especially the younger generation which wants to replace the theocratic regime with a secular democratic one at any price. The European Parliament should know that in the very near future it is going to deal with the people and not a minority of self-serving clerics and for that reason EP should exercise building bridge with the oppressed people of Iran and not the elements of the regime.

Madam Chair, The report further states that the EP delegates plan to discuss with Iranian leaders several issues, including human rights, nuclear negotiations, and drug trafficking. It has been consistently proven that the Islamic government of Iran is responsible for the worst human rights record in the world per capita; there are no other ‘countries’ that can rival the Iranian regime on this basis. The Islamic government in Iran is run and carried on by imposing terror, violence, and fear among its public. The regime has fortified its hold on power by resorting to arbitrary arrest, detention, rape, torture, and extrajudicial executions. The “alarming” rise in Iran’s extrajudicial execution rate has underscored the warning sign of mass atrocities in the country, a clear indication of regime’s ongoing silent genocides of political, social, ethnic, and religious groups. Other restrictions in the Islamic regime of Iran which violate international human rights norms include execution of offenders under 18 years of age, restrictions on freedom of speech, and the press, and restrictions on freedom of religion and gender quality. For more than 3 decades the state of human rights in the Islamic regime of Iran has been criticized both by Iranians and international human right activists, writers, and NGOs. The United Nations General Assembly and the Human Rights Commission have condemned prior and ongoing abuses in Iran in published critiques and several resolutions. However the government has disregarded all the critics and recommendations. On 13 October 2005, the European Parliament voted to adopt a resolution condemning the Islamic government's disregard of the human rights of its citizens. Later that year, Iran's government announced it would suspend dialogue with the European Union concerning human rights in Iran. Iran has never allowed independent bodies to look into its human rights record. In March 2011, former foreign minister of Republic of Maldives, Ahmed Shaheed was assigned by the UN Human Rights Council as its Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in Iran. Despite repeated requests, he never received a visa to Iran. The Iranian regime has made it clear on numerous occasions that they do not care for dialogue with the West. No self-respecting Western officials should offer any legitimacy to the Iranian regime which defiantly ignores the will of the international community.

Madam Chair, Years, if not decades, of diplomacy on deterring Iran’s nuclear program has led nowhere, consequently Iran blusters, threatens, and continues to work furiously on obtaining nuclear weapons, each passing day this potentially antagonistic regime is getting closer to test its first atomic bomb. The hardliners and fanatic leaders of this regime can easily promote the proliferation of dirty nuclear bombs and make them available in the hands of their terrorist proxies across the world. Just few days ago, the Institute for Science & International Security (ISIS) reported that the latest imagery from the Parchin military complex in Iran, suspected to have housed nuclear weapons development related tests, shows a further phase of activity. The IAEA is legally justified to ask Iran for access to this site in order to fulfill its mandate.  The question for the IAEA’s Director General and the Board of Governors is: what should now be done about Iran’s continued refusal of a legitimate request for access? A nuclear-armed Iran will seek regional dominance and be a threat to peace and stability in the Middle East and to the world. Only adopting a policy, which leads to a collapse of the power structure of this terrorist regime, would put an end to its escalating nuclear threat.

 Madam Chair, Reports indicate that for several years, Iran, particularly through Revolutionary Guard, has been taking advantage of the developed financial and commercial infrastructure in the Arab Gulf states for money laundering operations and drug trafficking to overcome the economic and financial difficulties on the home front as a result of the international sanctions which have been imposed on Tehran. Other reports state that Revolutionary Guard is running Iran drug trade. Based on remark by former regime officials, members of Iran’s RGC have seized control of drug trafficking throughout the Islamic regime, using multi-billion-dollar to establish links with a global crime network and further its goal of undermining the West. The US Government has stated that Revolutionary Guards commander,  helps Afghan smugglers to traffic narcotics into Iran for export abroad. Through the process of drug trafficking, Iran helps provide for its proxies and concurrently builds up a powerful network of unlikely associates to gain influence and violent effect across Europe and the Americas.  Iran’s drug policy is just a matter of hypocrisy, outside the IRGC monopoly, those caught dealing drugs have been dealt with ruthlessly by the regime, it is reported that in several cities there have been mass, secret executions to wipe out chronic drug problems. Those killed mostly have come from poor rural backgrounds. Furthermore, trumped-up drugs charges have also been used to execute political prisoners and opposition supporters. Labeling political prisoners, or executed individuals as drug traffickers or rapper is tactic of Islamic Regime and the world is well aware of it. Last year, they hanged a Dutch woman on trumped up charges of involvement in drug smuggling, when in fact she had been originally arrested for participating in a political protest. The Dutch government closed its embassy and withdrew its ambassador in protest. Iran’s publicly-declared commitment to fighting the war against drugs is both a smokescreen and a charade. Getting help from such hypocrite regime in combating trafficking and heroin production would only perceive as carrying water in a sieve.

Madam Chair, Among the most disturbing meetings on the draft schedule for the Europeans is a visiting session with some of the regime’s leaders including:

1. Sadegh Larijani, Iranian Chief Justice, who was sanctioned by the EU in March for his role in human rights violations.

2. Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, former president of Iran. An Argentinian judge issued an arrest warrant for Rafsanjani, in 2006, for his role in the 1994 bombing of the AMIA Jewish community center in Buenos Aires that killed 85 people.  He is the one who said: “The use of even one nuclear bomb inside Israel will destroy everything; however it would only harm the Islamic world.” He added:  "It is not irrational to contemplate such an eventuality."

3. Kazem Jalali, Chairman of the Friendship Group between the Majlis and the European Parliament, is said to “boast “on his website of his membership of the Bassidj paramilitary force and IRGC, which is on the EU and US terrorist list. In a recent speech he praised the victory of Hezbollah over the "Zionist regime" in the 33-day war in Lebanon, claiming it to be one of Iran's "greatest achievements".

4. Alaeddin Boroujerdi, the Chairman for the Committee for Foreign Policy and National Security of the Islamic Consultative Assembly of Iran. In October 2011, he was arrested for embezzlement and bank fraud, and corruption charges, he was released after 24 hours by mediation from Ali Larijani. However, he has been pressured to resign because of the controversy, but has been reconfirmed in his post for the 9th Majlis. In November 2011 he asked the foreign ministry “to expel the British ambassador from the country” in retaliation for newly imposed sanctions.

Madam Chair, Based on Article 6 and 11, of the EU Treaty, EP delegations shall maintain and develop Parliament’s international contacts. Accordingly, delegation activities shall contribute to promoting in third countries the values on which the European Union is founded, namely the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law. How would you justify contributing such promotions while scheduling to meet the Iranian parliamentary members many of whom are among commanders of the disreputable Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) that have been involved in horrifying human rights abuses, drug trafficking, and act of terrorism across the globe. Iran will only respond to a message of strength. EU governments delivered that message this week, by imposing new sanctions on Iran.

Madam Chair, Instability is growing at a rapid pace inside Iran and the political situation is changing. This trend is aggravated by a worsening economic condition which has brought Iran to the verge of major change. The people of Iran, in their struggle for freedom, have stood against the widespread repression of the regime. There is the need for EU policy towards Iran to express solidarity with all those resisting repression and fighting for basic freedoms and democracy. Rather than setting out a delegation team to Iran, which would give the regime a new blood to revitalize; it would serve Europe and the world community to a great extent to put their hope on Iranian people. The people of Iran are struggling to secure their civil and political rights and advocate for greater public participation in the political process, as well as the respect of human rights, freedoms and the rule of law, which will only be achieved through a regime change toward securing a secular and democratic government based on the principle of human rights.



CC: Martin Schulz (President, Conference of Presients), Joseph Daul, Hannes Swoboda, Guy Verhofstadt, Rebecca Harms, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Marin Callanan, Gabriele Zimmer, Francesco Speroni, Nigel Farage

Respectfully,
Undersigned:
  1. Mansur Rastani, PhD, University Professor, USA
  2. Amir Houshmand Momtaz, M.D., Physician, USA
  3. Shahpour Bahrami, Industrial Manager, USA
  4. Maryam Moazenazedh, MS in Chemistry, Malaysia
  5. Sheri Alvandian, Peace and Human Rights Activist, USA
  6. Fereidoon Farsi, Human Rights Activist & Civil engineer, Belgium
  7. Amir Ahmadi, Merchant, Iran
  8. Mohsen Razani, Auto Agent, USA
  9. Esmaeil Hoshyar, Author, and Comics Writer, & Political Activist, Swiss
  10. Hooshang Lahooti, PhD, Senior Research Scientist, Medical School, Sydney Univ, Australia
  11. Ardalan Moghaddam Ghadimi, Construction Technician Canada
  12. Jahanshah Rashidian, Pscychologist, Germany


Friday, October 12, 2012

Why Washington won't listen to millions of people in the Middle East opposition


Yesterday I was sitting in a cafe waiting for a group of scholars, reading an Emirates institute book from the shelf that expressed, the culmination of energy interests and defense spending is not enough to account for the reasons why western leadership will not support democracy in the region, and chooses instead to enable extremism. 

Yes, western governments have the upper-hand of power in the world, and certainly they have the best of intentions, no matter the policy decision. But they have to pick their battles, and they only know their choices by who walks in their door and educates them on the options. 

Lobbying and government relations comes at a price of manpower, prestige, connectivity, and influence. Any individual can make a sizable contribution to their political candidate of choice, shake their hand, but this does not mean that the funds will actually result in any advocacy or remembrance down the line. 

Western leaders know the person who walks in their door and has repeated conversations with them regarding insight and direction on next steps. Outside that door, western leaders are limited to being sole observers. It does not matter how many millions of people fill the streets and risk their lives for their preferences, how many hundreds of thousands are tortured and butchered in political prisons, or how many tens of thousands die in brutal massacres. If there is no one in a member of congress' office, if there is no one at the US State Department, if there is no one inside the US Defense Department, day in, day out, engaging in the debate and furthering the platform, no one from America will come to the rescue. What more, it matters even less if these very unsung do not have a plan for unlocking and rearranging the $25 Trillion dollars in the global market which is threatened by warfare, even if the market could ultimately be freed and more lucrative for all in the end. 

When a series of groups affiliated to the Muslim Brotherhood not only engage in government relations, but also hold seats at affiliate groups like US Institute of Peace, entities like the Syrian National Council maintain the upper-hand of influence, because absolutely no one is in any of those offices as much as MB or SNC is. MB and SNC have plenty of funds for these activities, so why not the Middle East secular democratic and human rights promoting opposition?

Who do you trust? Who do you represent? Who is out there? Who is making a difference? Who are the beneficiaries that would be advocated for in the process of any government relations? How do you know they are legitimate? What is the difference between a secular, a reformist, an extremist, or a terrorist? How do you know these beneficiaries are actually speaking for the people? 

What is enough? What does it take to prove how effective the beneficiaries are? What does it take to prove that certain groups are 100% justifiable to be advocated for? How have sponsors been betrayed? How have the people been betrayed? How many people are burnt out? Is this really impossible? 

No. WIth the most effective beneficiaries having evidenced track records of activities and positive change on the ground, exhibited positive relations with western leadership, extended affiliation with peer groups both from their own country and other countries, strict denouncing of extremism, and commitments to in as nonviolent transitions as possible, there is absolutely no excuse not to support the Middle East opposition for who they are, who they represent, and what they dedicate their lives to. Whether they are from Iran, Syria, Egypt, or anywhere else in the region, the oppressed women, silenced scholars, tortured human rights lawyers, businessmen who have been shut down and beat up, raped children, defected government officials, defected military, diaspora, and everyone else on the right side of the fence deserves your support. This generation's passion for liberty is an entirely different definition of "Make Love, Not War", because there, the right to Love is the right to hold hands in public, the right to choose your own husband, the right to wear your hair down in public for your husband, the right to divorce a husband who rapes and beats you every night, and the right to bring peace to the world by freeing their own country in the essence of Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., and Einstein combined.

Let there be no more martyrs. 

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Iran & Syria: Demonstrations and Directions


Tehran, Iran
Today's demonstrations around the merchants bazaar calling for closing shop in protest of the Iranian regime and subsequent failing economy

Video 1: Anti-regime bazaar protest, "If you have dignity then close your shops"

Video 2: "Stop supporting Assad, Do something to support us"

Video 3: Security forces attempt to control strike in Tehran bazaar

Video 4: Protest - "Death to this government"


Kurdish areas, Syria
In a wave of demonstrations by thousands of Syrian Kurdish people going on for months, Syrian Kurds are calling for a decentralized federal Syria. 

Researcher: There is no substitute for federal post-Assad Syria (Arabic)
Dr. Mahmoud Abbas on demonstrations this weekend in multiple towns across the Kurdish area including Derik, Tirbespi, Amude, Ras al Ayn, and Kobani

Images from demonstration in Tirbespi, August 24, 2012

Images from demonstration in Tirbespi, August 17, 2012

Footage appreciation to Kurdistan National Assembly of Syria, member of Syrian Democratic Coalition including also Union of Syrian Arab Tribes and Christian Democratic Movement



Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Syrian Support Group: Free Syrian Army article archive


Syrian Support Group - Selected Press
Brian Sayers, Government Relations 
Selected FSA Commanders


Quick take: Supplying Weapons to the Free Syrian Army - Brian Sayers, SSG
Middle East Voice, VOA, 9/18/2012


Weapons Strategy to 'take out' Assad assets
Hard Talk, BBC, 8/29/2012 


Syrian Emigres Seek Aid in US to Arm Rebels 
NY Times, 8/29/2012


Passing the Hat for the Syrian Rebels
The American Conservative, 8/17/2012


The Rebels: We Need Intel More Than Arms
Time, 7/13/2012


Syrian opposition group organizes to send funds to rebel army
Reuters, 8/10, 2012


How Safe Are Donations to Syrian Rebels?
NPR, 8/9/2012


Syria: US clears way for Americans to start donating money to rebels
Telegraph UK, 8/5/2012


With Annan Out, US Is Pressured To Act In Syria
NPR, 8/3/2012


Syria: Mission Impossible
Christine Amanpour, CNN, 8/2/2012


Wary US develops support for Syria rebels
Financial Times, 8/2/2012


First armed clashes between Jordanian and Syrian armies
Times of Israel, 8/2/2012


US eases arms purchases for Syrian rebels
McClatchy Newspapers, 8/1/2012


Obama authorized covert support for Syrian rebels, sources say
CNN, 8/1/2012


Group Gets US License to Fund Syria Rebels
Wall Street Journal, 7/31/2012


US Authorizes Advocacy Group to Aid Syrian Rebels, Build Up Opposition Army
Antiwar.com, 7/28/2012


US Authorizes Financial Support For the Free Syrian Army
Al-Monitor, 7/27/2012


Syrian Opposition Leaders; We Need US Weapons
The Daily Beast, 7/23/2012


Syrian rebels seek to 'liberate' Aleppo
iStockAnalyst, 7/23/2012


EU tightens arms embargo against Syria
UPI.com, 7/23/2012


Syria rebels clash with troops in Aleppo and Damascus
CBC, 7/22/2012


Emboldened Syrian rebels push into Aleppo
USA Today, 7/22/2012


Syrian rebels say fight for Aleppo has begun
Associated Press, 7/22/2012

Thursday, September 6, 2012

The World According to Syrian Kurdistan


World Affairs Journal
Michael J. Totten

The odds that Syria’s tyrant Bashar al-Assad will survive the insurrection against him are increasingly slim, but the civil war might last a lot longer. The opening chapter pits the Baath Party regime and its paramilitary units against the Free Syrian Army, but there are other factions that have a stake in what happens next. Most of Syria’s Alawites—who make up roughly twelve percent of the population—are with the regime. They may face persecution from the majority if Assad loses. They might also mount a terrorist war against a new government, either from the alleyways of Damascus or from a breakaway state of their own on the Mediterranean.

The Sunni Arab majority is not only divided between Islamists and secularists, but also by region and tribe. The Christian and Druze minorities are nervously watching and waiting. And the Kurdish minority in the northeast hopes to divorce all of the above and go its own way like the Kurds have in Iraq. 

Most Kurds are Sunni Muslims, but the Muslim Brotherhood and other radical Islamist groups have never been able to get much traction in that community. The Muslim Brotherhood is an exclusively Sunni organization, and it’s also, for the most part, an Arab one. Rather than viewing Islam as “the solution” to what ails them, most Kurds in Syria as well as Iraq view freedom and independence as the solution, along with an alliance with the U.S. and Israel.

I recently spoke with Dr. Sherkoh Abbas, leader of the Kurdistan National Assembly of Syria.

MJT: Okay, let me start by asking you what’s going on right now in Syrian Kurdistan. I’ve hardly seen any mention of it whatsoever in the Western media.

Sherkoh Abbas: We’ve been ignored by the Western media, by the Middle Eastern media, and by the international community altogether. Maybe it’s because we don’t hijack planes, kidnap and kill people, or blow-up any buildings. The wheels that make the noise get the grease, and we haven’t made any noise until recently, beginning with a major uprising in 2004. Today the Kurdish street will not accept anything less than federation or at least a Kurdish Federal Region.

The Kurds of Syria are primarily poor because of the Arabization policies that were implemented during the Baath Party’s time. Even though oil and gas come from the Kurdistan region, less than one percent is invested there. Most Kurds are educated, but we have been deprived of basic human and national rights.

Today, the Kurdish street is vocal and is against Kurdish political parties because of their failed strategies, their bickering and fighting with each other, and their alliances with non-Syrian Kurds. We have three major classical Kurdish political parties; one group allied with Barzani from Iraqi Kurdistan, another group allied with Talabani from Iraqi Kurdistan, and one allied with the PKK.

Since 2006 we in the Kurdistan National Assembly of Syria have supported regime-change and the creation of a Kurdistan Federal Region in Syria. In contrast, most of the above groups promote vague goals such as democracy and limited administration. They have not been clear on regime-change, so most Kurds now reject them even more. In  recent days they’ve been saying they want the right of self-determination within Syria, a contradiction. Last week Kurds in Syria came out and said that they support federalism and our road-map for the creation of a Kurdistan Regional Government.

We need assistance from the international community because the Muslim Brotherhood and the Turkish AK party are promoting and supporting groups that aren’t democratic and don’t fully support the Kurdish cause. The outsiders are aware that Kurds are not happy with their traditional political parties, so they’re providing money and assistance to steer people toward Islamic organizations.  

MJT: What do you think of the Free Syrian Army? Should the United States provide assistance to them or let them fight the Assad regime on their own?

Sherkoh Abbas: The Free Syrian Army is made up of defectors from the regular Syrian army who grew up with the doctrine of the Arab Socialist Baath Party. It is also influenced in part by the Muslim Brotherhood. This means it is not established with principles of democracy and freedom. It is therefore uninterested in helping the Kurds in Syria or in promoting our rights due to their values. The Free Syrian Army’s views on the Kurdish issue in Syria is no different from that of the regular army. In the future it will be another obstacle to freedom and democracy in the region.

The United States can’t influence the Free Syrian Army without strenuous efforts in education which should focus on protecting the rights of ethnic and religious minorities in the country.

MJT: Why does the Assad regime support the PKK [the Marxist-Leninist terrorist organization that has been waging war against Turkey for decades]?

Sherkoh Abbas: Assad's regime doesn’t just support the PKK. It also works to revitalize the Armenians and Alevis in Turkey. It is aligned with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine in a desperate attempt to expand the spread of fire from Syria.

MJT: Is it true that the Assad government has withdrawn its security forces from Kurdish cities?

Sherkoh Abbas: Assad has removed some key army units, but his security agencies are still in place to prevent unfriendly groups from taking over. And, of course, there are groups that work with the regime, including Arab settlers, Assyrians, and Syriacs along with some Kurds.

The Kurdistan region in general is anti-Assad, anti-Baath, anti-Arab Nationalism, and wants regime change, but we do not want the Muslim Brotherhood to control us, nor any groups associated with the above ruling elements. 

MJT: What kind of relations do you have with the Barzani government in Iraqi Kurdistan?

Sherkoh Abbas: We have very good and brotherly relations, though we see tremendous pressure on our brothers in Iraq’s Kurdistan Regional Government. At times their policy is geared more toward survival than helping us. And we are accustomed to the United States abandoning us by supporting Iraq's central government and the Turkish government at our expense.

MJT: What do you and most Syrian Kurds think of Israel? If the Israelis offered to help, would you accept it?

Sherkoh Abbas: I have said this many times: Israelis never killed or slaughtered Syrian people the way the current regime is doing. We have no issues with the Israelis. We want to solve our problems peacefully through dialogue and negotiations. Israelis, like Kurds, are targeted for elimination by the tyrannical regimes in the Middle East, so we are natural allies.

We ask Israel to help the Syrian people—all the Syrian people—and to use its political influence in the world to support the revolution and promote democracy in the region. We need all the help we can get from every country willing to help us.

Look, 400 Syrian men, women, and children were just slaughtered by the regime. Aside from the Salafists and the Muslim Brotherhood, who wouldn’t want help from Israel? The Israelis don’t kill people arbitrarily or oppress anyone in Syria the way most Arab governments do.

For fifty years Middle Eastern dictatorships turned Israel and the West into excuses to oppress people. We need to move beyond these failed dictatorial regimes and construct decentralized democratic systems where both minorities and majorities enjoy peace and freedom.

MJT: What changes would you like to see in American foreign policy?

Sherkoh Abbas: The United States uses an outdated policy from the Cold War. It needs a more pro-active policy based on human rights, democracy, freedom, and national interests. You should not continue on the current path of supporting ruthless dictatorships at the expense of human rights. We want American foreign policy to back democracy and minority rights, even if it might undermine current alliances, in order to build long-lasting relationships based on mutual interest. And we need American support for a democratic and decentralized Syria.

MJT: Has President Barack Obama reached out in any way to Syrian Kurds?

Sherkoh Abbas: Yes, to pressure us into watering down our demands to such an extent that it would be suicidal for any Kurdish leader to accept it. The Kurdish street loudly supports federalism. We want the Obama administration to be sensitive to our needs. 

There are 22 Arab countries and none of them are democratic. We have suffered under nationalists, secularists, Arab Nationalists, Islamists, and Baathists. We cannot believe that the Free Syrian Army and its supporters in Qatar and Turkey who say regime-change and democracy should be enough to fix all our problems.

MJT: What do you expect will happen if Assad is overthrown?

Sherkoh Abbas: Full scale civil war. It has already started. Syria could change from a failed dictatorship to something that looks like Somalia or Afghanistan, or—at best—Lebanon during its civil war. The fighting will continue and Syria could become a haven for Islamists.

The United States should work with Russia and create a federal system. Russian interests can be guaranteed in an Alawite state while American and Israeli interests can be guaranteed in Syrian Kurdistan.