Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Honigman: A Purim Wish...Longing For Achashverosh


By Gerald Honigman, Virtual Jerusalem 

It's early March, and that means that the Jewish holiday of Purim is fast approaching. Non-Jews may know it by way of the Hebrew Bible's ("OldTestament") Book of Esther, the story of how a young Jewess helped to save her people from those who would have destroyed them in ancient Iran some twenty-five centuries ago. 

Unfortunately, besides Purim, there are additional holidays which also commemorate the Jews' near misses or actual calamities at the hands of others as well. Tisha B'Av (the 9th of the month of Av--the date of the destruction of the two Temples), Chanukah, and Passover come to mind.

To be more specific, as I begin to write this, today is March 5, 2012, and Israel's Prime Minister Netanyahu recently appeared on television along with President Obama discussing the Jews' modern Iranian threat. Iran's current, would-be nuclear rulers refer to Israel as being, among other things, a "one bomb" country. I don't believe I have to explain that any further, do I ?

So, in some ways, some things change while others do not. Instead of an Iranian emperor's wicked prime minister (Haman) plotting their demise some twenty-five centuries ago, Jews now face attack and extermination by Arabized Iranian Islamists.

The situation is sad for many reasons.


Firstly, prior to the Arab conquest and spread of the Dar ul-Islam into the country, and despite the earlier episode involving Purim, Iran actually had a fairly positive balance sheet in its relations with both Jews and the latter's own state. Iran was an ally of Judea in its fight for freedom against Rome--for whatever its reasons. And, some six centuries later, ancient, non-Jewish sources recorded an army of tens of thousands of Jews from the Galilee and adjacent areas who joined Iranian armies to fight the hated Byzantines. This happened just on the eve of the Arabs' own extensive imperial Caliphal conquests of the entire region in the 7th century C.E.

Secondly, the Arabs and Arabized (like Iran) are correct when they joke about how Jews cherish life...To save one soul is to save an entire universe. And no seventy-two virgins await the Jew who blows up Arab or Iranian babies or decapitates them with knives as the former promote to their own shahids. Israel's late Prime Minister, Golda Meir, summed this up nicely when she stated back in 1972...
We can forgive the Arabs (or anyone) for killing our children. We cannot forgive them for forcing us to kill their children.

And, unlike the genocidal Arab, Iranian, and other enemies they face, Jews don't deliberately use anyone's children as human shields.

Thus, there is no doubt that Israel faces a situation today that it never wanted--one in which it will truly be damned if it does and damned if it doesn't act.

But a nation made up of a people, many of whose families were already subjected to one Holocaust (not to mention what happened before in history as well), cannot afford to take the genocidal threats of a nation like Iran--which promises to wage yet another Holocaust against them--in any other way except at face value.

The 12'er Shi'a Islamist leaders calling the shots today--both figuratively and literally--do not share that love for human life which they mock the Jews about.

The mullahs used their own children to clear mine fields in their 1980s war with Iraq, have slaughtered countless thousands of those who oppose them, hang Kurds and others who just seek human rights ( let alone political ones) almost daily, and deliberately seek world turmoil and chaos (a la nuclear conflagration?) to bring about the return of their "Hidden Imam," the Mahdi. They have supplied scores of thousands of sophisticated missiles and other armaments to their stooges who surround Israel and support even further their butcher buddies in Syria. Furthermore, they don't care how many of their own people die in their direct and proxy wars to slaughter Jews.

Now, given this stark reality, pretend for one moment that you, dear reader, are Israel's Netanyahu. And with each day that goes by due to others twisting your arm, the chance for success at stopping the ultimate catastrophe diminishes since more and more of your prime targets get buried deeper and deeper underground away from your air force and such.

The economic sanctions President Obama now finally talks about are good ones--but needed to have been applied at least three years ago. At that time, there was still some breathing space in terms of Iran's approaching its zone of immunity due to the fast pace it's now actually on to develop nukes and have them adequately protected. And there is no evidence, even now after tougher economic sanctions have been applied, that progress on Iran's nuclear militarization path has slowed. Indeed, reports show that the contrary is true. Recent talk of Iran being willing to negotiate fools no one but the fools...

Simply put, we don't have the same breathing space today as we had years ago when Israel first warned the world and was ignored--regardless of the false analogy some will make regarding Iraq. See this article if you need further elaboration on that last point. It also became a chapter in 
my book.

Unlike a geographically much larger Iran, with a population approaching 90 million, Israel is a nation which--as I like to point out--requires a magnifying glass to find on a world globe.

Furthermore, some 85% of its six million Jews (why am I nervous about that number?) live in that narrow 9 to 15-mile wide waistband in the middle of the country (courtesy of the '49 armistice lines)--concentrated, easy bulls-eyes for retaliatory strikes coming at them from almost all directions.

With this heavy on my mind, I think once again of Purim--just a few days away.

Jews have lived in Iran at least since the days when Cyrus the Great liberated many of them from Babylonian captivity (in what's now Iraq) and allowed those who wanted to return to Judah, the surviving kingdom of the Jews after the spit with the northern tribes of Israel upon the death of King Solomon about three thousand years ago, the chance to do so.

Many chose, however, to stay behind and formed prominent Jewish communities as they spread eastwards.

Judah became a thankful vassal state to the vast Iranian empire, with Jewish warriors serving as part of the Iranian military, and so forth.

Judean garrisons served in places such as Elephantine, Egypt, near today's Aswan. 
Ancient papyri have been discovered which give additional testimony to this vibrant community which pre-dated the Iranian conquests and, among other things, had its own temple.

Besides the account of Cyrus the Great's liberation in the Jews' own scriptures (Ezra 1:1-8, Hebrew Bible), we have historical corroboration of this in ancient Iranian records as well. Below are excerpts from the Kurash Prism, the decree of Cyrus the Great for the return of the Jews to the current nation of Israel in 539 BCE. This version is found in the website of the Circle Of Ancient Iranian Studies:
I am Kurash, King of the World, Great King,...King of Babilani, King of Kiengir and Akkade, King of the four rims of the earth, Son of Kanbujiya...to the region from as far as Assura and Susa, Akkade, Eshnunna, the towns Zamban, Me-turnu, Der as well as the region of the Gutians, I returned to these sacred cities on the other side of the Tigris the sanctuaries of which have been ruins for a long time, the images which used to live therein and established for them permanent sanctuaries. I also gathered all their former inhabitants and returned them to their habitations. Furthermore, I resettled upon the command of Marduk, the great lord, all the gods of Kiengir and Akkade whom Nabonidus had brought into Babilani to the anger of the lord of the gods, unharmed, in their former temples, the places which make them happy. 

Within a half century of Cyrus's decree, the events which led to the story of Esther (the Iranian name for Hebrew Jewess, Hadassah) unfolded. The new Iranian ruler was Xerxes, and he began his rule in 486 B.C.E. His English name, Ahasueurus, was evidently derived from a Latinized form of the Hebrew, Achashverosh, which in turn was a rendering of the 
Babylonian Achshiyarshu.

Now, as the above source points out, it's important to also note that the Hebrew rendering may have actually been a title that the king was also known by--not his actual name. Keep this in mind for what comes next.

My friend and Kurdish freedom fighter (peshmerga), Hamma Mirwaisi, is--among other things-- an expert on the various related languages of the Airyanem Vaejah nations. He came to America around the same time that Secretary of State Kissinger pulled the rug out from under the Kurds' feet during their revolt (at America's instigation) against Saddam in Iraq in the '70s.Yes--Saddam Hussein was around that long.

When the Shah of Iran made his peace with Saddam, America then betrayed the Kurds. It would not be the last time that Washington would do this either. The late great New York Times columnist, William Safire, wrote a series of articles about this disgraceful sellout. The lucky ones got to flee for their lives, and some were allowed into America.

While we have our disagreements over some facts and interpretations of history, Hamma's own first book, Return of the Medes (ancestors of the Kurds), has many interesting revelations in it. And some of these have to do with Purim.

Here are some of Hamma's notes on the Iranian ruler, "Ahasveros":
the word means "it is a revolt now." "Aha" means "now." "Sveros" means "revolution" or "revolt." It is a call to revolt.

Emperor Cyaxares--Xerxes--was nicknamed (or "titled," as seen above) Ahashverosh or Ahasuerus because he called the Medes' enemies, the Scythians, to a feast and, on signal, had his supporters revolt and slaughter the drunken Scythians. The Book of Esther also tells of feasts that Achashverosh liked to have at his palace.

In the broader picture and as a footnote to all of this, I have been involved with the struggle of one of the Middle East's truly stateless peoples, the Kurds, for over four decades now. And, unlike the Arabs' quest for a 22nd state via the destruction of the sole, minuscule, resurrected state of the Jews, some 35 million Kurds have yet to see the birth of their first.

Thanks to Hamma, I will never read nor hear The Megillah (The Book Of Esther ) being recited again on Purim without thinking about my Kurdish friends.

Remember King Achashverosh in the Book of Esther?

Follow these excerpts from Hamma's Story #10,"Emperor Cyaxares I Plan To Liberate the Medians from the Scythia:
Cyaxares invited Madius (the Scythian ruler and subjugator of Medes) and a large number of his warriors to a festival...many laid down their arms and became drunk, but no Median warriors did so...When Cyaxares called out "Ahashverosh," the code word, the Medes attacked...Most Scythians were killed, some seized and arrested.

Cyaxares became known as the liberator of the Median people and was reinstated as the King of Kings of the Median Empire. He was nicknamed Ahashverosh, or Ahasuerus, for his attack on the Scythians. Aha means "now" and shverosh means "revolution" or "revolt."

Subsequent chapters of Hamma's book discuss Cyrus, Queen Vashti, Assyria, Babylonia, Esther, and so forth--all important to the history of the Jews as well.

As I get ready to celebrate my people's ancient story of Mordechai and his niece Esther once again, I long for the days when at least two ancient and great peoples, those of all of the Airyanem Vaejah nations and my own, may once again live together in peace. And extra icing on the cake would be improved relations between the Persian people and their Kurdish cousins as well.

While this may all sound like mere pipe dreams, just consider what is now transpiring in the land of the mullahs' best friend.

If the Assads fall in Syria (by no means a certainty, given the support they are receiving from some key powers such as Russia, China, and Iran itself), and the more tolerant, inclusive elements in the opposition (such as the Syria Democratic Coalition--SDC) get the crucial support that they need (instead of the Islamists getting it and gaining ascendancy, as they've done elsewhere), then similar forces may muster the courage to take on their own oppressors in Iran yet again. They surfaced in 2009 during the stolen election, but were brutally suppressed--the world watching and doing nothing. The latter was too worried about such things as Israel building a security barrier to protect its kids from being disemboweled by the mullah's Arab jihadi counterparts to deal with such issues.

The big question, however, involves what the outside world would actually do now to support this.

While the powers that be later supported the overthrow of folks like Libya's Qaddafi and Egypt's Mubarak, the Obama Administration, the American State Department, the European Union, the United Nations, and others simply stood by and did nothing as Iranian opponents of the Islamist theocracy were slaughtered in the streets just a few years earlier. Unfortunately, given this lack of international resolve and Islamist policies and theology, I see no bright future for freedom in Iran.

Perhaps it will take the rise of a powerful--but altruistic--ruler to set Iran on a new course that will benefit not only its own diverse peoples but others as well. Such a leader could truly prepare Iran for the same democracy that its giant neighbor to the east, India, has shown is indeed possible.

The trick will be in finding such a courageous, rare gem--neither megalomanical shah nor murderous mullah--a leader who truly loves his people and wants what is best for them not only in Paradise but in the here and now of the real world in which we all live. Admittedly, it is not only in Iran where such leaders are hard to find.

But, what is needed as we approach Purim 2012 is the rise of a new and improved Achashverosh--a ruler who, as my Kurdish friend, Hamma, translated and explained it above, will live up to that title and lead Iran in a revolt for the good of the entire nation and the world at large.

http://www.virtualjerusalem.com/blogs.php?Itemid=6326

Saturday, March 3, 2012

Event: The Syrian Tinderbox: A psychological profile of Assad and best bets for putting out the fire


NATIONAL PRESS CLUB MEDIA ALERT

A psychological profile of Assad and best bets for putting out the fire
WHAT: Release of psychological profile of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and panel discussion
WHERE: National Press Club, Zenger Room, 529 14th St. NW, Washington

WHEN: Wednesday, March 8, 2012, 12:30 p.m.
WHO:

· Walid Phares, PhD, advisor to the US House Anti-Terrorism Caucus; Author, “The Coming Revolution: Struggle for Freedom in the Middle East”; Washington

· Ekaterina Egorova, PhD, Political Psychologist & Consultant, Personal political consultant to President Boris Yeltsin; Consultant to corporations and political campaigns; Washington and Moscow.

· Magistrate Wolfgang Sobotka, Deputy Governor of the State of Lower Austria

· Michael Granger, Founder & Chairman, Capital Access Forum; Board Member, e-Lynxx Corp.; Serves on a White-House panel of industry leaders convened by the President’s Chief Economic Advisors; Chicago and Washington.

· Ken Feltman (Moderator), Publisher, Radnor Reports; contributor to Politico; past president, American League of Lobbyists and International Association of Political Consultants; Washington.


TOPICS TO BE EXPLORED:

· Will Assad bend or break?

· Is Syria providing a smokescreen to Iran’s ambitions?

· Which opposition parties offer the best bet for regional stability and protecting Western interests?

· Could Syria trigger a slide into global recession?

· Will the Muslim Brotherhood seize political control, as it has in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya?

· How is the Syrian opposition currying favor in Europe?

· With the killing of journalists in Syria and the levying of criminal charges against and departure of US NGO employees in Egypt, is any hope of transparency, human rights, and liberty slipping away?


CONTACTS: 
Elizabeth Kelley Grace, 561-702-7471, elizabeth@thebuzzagency.net
Ellen Yui, 301-270-8571, ellenyui@yuico.com


BACKGROUND: 

Not groomed as heir and ascending to the Syrian presidency only after the early death of his elder brother, Bashar al-Assad had difficulty reproducing his father’s model of hard leadership. After an early attempt to modernize the political system, he found many citizens unwilling to live in the Assads’ empire and drew a conclusion typical of politicians with low self-esteem: deadly enemies pose a threat to everything that is dear to him, including the cause of his father, his clan and the party. Steeped in paranoia, a high need for power, a strong sense of danger and no fear of rejection, Bashar al Assad’s psychological profile mirrors those of some of history’s most brutal dictators.

Bashar al-Assad’s regime has massacred more than 5,400 Syrian citizens since March 2011, and the estimated number of political prisoners is reaching 40,000. In her Jan. 31 statement at the United Nations, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the world faces a choice: stand with the people of Syria or be complicit in the Assad regime’s brutal violence. On Jan. 24, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and Sen. Charles Schumer introduced a bill imposing sanctions on Syria titled The Syrian Human Rights Accountability Act. Sen. John McCain has recently called to start supporting the Syrian opposition against Assad. “We all know that change is coming to Syria,” Clinton told the UN Security Council. “The question is how many more innocent civilians will die before Assad bows to the inevitable, and how unstable a country he will leave behind.” 

Hosted by Radnor Reports. For more information, visit radnorreports.com.

http://radnorreports.com/2012/03/01/the-syrian-tinderbox/

Friday, February 17, 2012

Islamist Lobbies' Washington War on Arab and Muslim Liberals - Essam Abdallah

(Article below comment)
A note from Investigative Project on Terrorism Executive Director Steven Emerson:

Please take the time to read this very important story written by a courageous Egyptian liberal intellectual about the Islamist and Muslim Brotherhood lobbies in Washington and the Obama Administration's secret collaboration with these pro-terrorist, anti-Western, anti-women, anti-American and anti-Semitic organizations. This is one of the most important articles I have read in years.
It was just revealed two days ago that FBI Director Mueller secretly met on February 8 at FBI headquarters with a coalition of groups including various Islamist and militant Arabic groups who in the past have defended Hamas and Hizballah and have also issued blatantly anti-Semitic statements. At this meeting, the FBI revealed that it had removed more than 1000 presentations and curricula on Islam from FBI offices around the country that was deemed "offensive." The FBI did not reveal what criteria was used to determine why material was considered "offensive" but knowledgeable law enforcement sources have told the IPT that it was these radical groups who made that determination. Moreover, numerous FBI agents have confirmed that from now on, FBI headquarters has banned all FBI offices from inviting any counter-terrorist specialists who are considered "anti-Islam" by Muslim Brotherhood front groups.
The February 8 FBI meeting was the culmination of a series of unpublicized directives issued in the last three months by top FBI officials to all its field offices to immediately recall and withdraw any presentation or curricula on Islam throughout the entire FBI. In fact, according to informed sources and undisclosed documents, the FBI directive was instigated by radical Muslim groups in the US who had repeatedly met with top officials of the Obama Administration to complain, among other things, that the mere usage of the term of "radical Islam" in FBI curricula was "offensive" and 'racist." And thus, directives went out by Attorney General Eric Holder and FBI Director Mueller to censor all such material. Included in the material destroyed or removed by the FBI and the DOJ were powerpoints and articles that defined jihad as "holy war" or presentations that portrayed the Muslim Brotherhood as an organization bent on taking over the world—a major tenant that the Muslim Brotherhood has publicly stated for decades.
During the next several months, the IPT will be releasing a series of major investigative reports revealing the secret infiltration by and collaboration with radical Islamic organizations by the Obama administration that has spread to the National Security Council, the Dept of Justice, the FBI, the Dept of Homeland Security, the CIA and the State Department as well as local law enforcement.

-------


Islamist Lobbies' Washington War on Arab and Muslim Liberals
by Essam Abdallah
The Cutting Edge News
February 16, 2012

The most dramatic oppression of the region's civil societies and the Arab Spring is not by means of weapons, or in the Middle East. It is not led by Gaddafi, Mubarak, Bin Ali, Saleh, or Assad. It is led by the powerful Islamist lobbies in Washington DC. People may find my words curious if not provocative. But my arguments are sharp and well understood by many Arab and middle eastern liberals and freedom fighters. Indeed, we in the region, who are struggling for real democracy, not for the one time election type of democracy have been asking ourselves since January 2011 as the winds of Arab spring started blowing, why isn't the West in general and the United States Administration in particular clearly and forcefully supporting our civil societies and particularly the secular democrats of the region? Why were the bureaucracies in Washington and in Brussels partnering with Islamists in the region and not with their natural allies the democracy promoting political forces?

Months into the Arab Spring, we realized that the Western powers, and the Obama Administration have put their support behind the new authoritarians, those who are claiming they will be brought to power via the votes of the people. Well, it is not quite so.

The Muslim Brotherhood, the Islamic Nahda of Tunisia, the Justice Party of Morocco and the Islamist militias in Libya's Transitional National Council have been systematically supported by Washington at the expense of real liberal and secular forces. We saw day by day how the White House guided carefully the statements and the actions of the US and the State Department followed through to give all the chances to the Islamists and almost no chances to the secular and revolutionary youth. We will come back to detail these diplomatic and financial maneuvers which are giving victory to the fundamentalists while the seculars and progressives are going to be smashed by the forthcoming regimes.

In the US, there are interests that determine foreign policy. And there are lobbies that put pressure to get their objectives met in foreign policy. One of the most powerful lobbies in America under the Obama Administration is the Muslim Brotherhood greater lobby, which has been in action for many years. This lobby has secured many operatives inside the Administration and has been successful in directing US policy towards the Arab world. Among leading advisors sympathetic to the Ikhwan is Daliah Mogahed (Mujahid) and her associate, Georgetown Professor John Esposito. Just as shocking, there is also a pro-Iranian lobby that has been influencing US policy towards Iran and Hezbollah in the region.

One of the most important activities of the Islamist lobby in the US is the waging of political and media wars on the liberal Arabs and Middle Eastern figures and groups in America. This battlefield is among the most important in influencing Washington's policies in the Arab world. If you strike at the liberal and democratic Middle Eastern groups in Washington who are trying to gain support for civil societies in the region, you actually win a major battle. You will be able to influence the resources of the US Government to support the Islamists in the Middle East and not the weak democrats. This huge war waged by the Islamist lobbies in America started at the end of the Cold war and continued all the way till the Arab spring. The two main forces of this lobby are the Muslim Brotherhood fronts and the Iranian fronts. According to research available in the US, the Ikhwan fronts such as CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations), led by Hamas supporter Nihad Awad, as well as the Muslim Public Affairs Council, the Islamic Society of North America, and others waged their political war to block the representatives of Arab liberals and Muslim moderates from making their case to the American public. The Iranian lobby, exemplified by the National Iranian American Committee (NIAC), led by Trita Parsi, has been hitting at Iranian exiles.

Since the 1990s CAIR and its allies have attacked Copts, Southern Sudanese, Lebanese, Syrian reformers, Assyrians and Chaldeans, and Muslim dissidents in the United States. The Ikhwan of America demonized any publication, book, article, or interview in the national media or local press raising the issue of secular freedoms in the Middle East. The Islamists wanted to eliminate the liberal cause in the Arab world and replace it with the cause of the Islamists. What is also shocking is that CAIR and its allies stood by the oppressive regimes and visited them, claiming they speak on behalf of the peoples. CAIR and the Brotherhood fronts in America destroyed systematically every project that would have defended the seculars and liberals originating from the Middle East. The notorious and well-funded Islamists of the US allowed no book, documentary, or show on the liberals in Arab civil societies to see the light.

Thanks to this powerful lobbying campaign, the American public was not given a chance to learn about the deep feelings on the youth in the region. Americans were led to believe that all Muslims, all Arabs and all Middle Easterners were a strange species of humans who cannot appreciate freedom. Instead, the American Islamists, helped by apologists on the petrodollars payrolls, convinced the mainstream media that the Arab world has authoritarians and Islamists only.

Dr Shawki Karas, president of the American Coptic Association, told me in the late 1990s how he was harassed by Islamist activists for speaking up against the Mubarak regime and the Muslim Brotherhood in America. He was threatened with losing his job at the college where he taught. Reverend Keith Roderick, who has assembled a coalition of more than 50 group rights from the Muslim world, was severely attacked by the Islamists and was threatened to be removed from his church position. Muslim American leaders who are conservative and secular, such as Dr Zuhdi Jasser, were crucified by CAIR and the Brotherhood for daring to challenge the Party line of the Isl.amists in America and claiming that the Jihadists are the problem in the region. Muslim liberal dissidents such as Somali Ayan Hirsi Ali, Saudi Ali al Yammi, Syrian Farid Ghadri, Iranian Manda Ervin, and many others were trashed by the Islamist lobbies to block them from defending the causes of secular liberty in the US. Egyptian liberals as well as seculars and democracy activists from Iraq, Sudan, Syria, and other countries have been attacked by CAIR and allies. The pro-Iranian lobby targeted most Iranian-American groups and tried to discredit them, particularly with the rise of the Green Revolution in Iran. By smearing the Muslim liberal exiles, the Islamists were trying to destroy their causes in the mother countries. In the 1990s and the years that followed 9/11 the region's dictators supported the efforts by Islamist lobbies to crush the liberal exiles. The Mubarak, Bashir, Gaddafi, Assad, and Khomeinist regimes fully supported the so-called Islamophobia campaign waged by CAIR and its Iranian counterpart NIAC against dissidents for calling for secular democracy in the region. The dissidents were accused of being pro-Western by both the Islamists and the dictators.

The Islamist lobbies also severely attacked members of the US Congress such as Democrats Tom Lantos, who has since passed away, Eliot Engel, Howard Berman, Gary Ackerman, and Joe Lieberman as well as Republicans Frank Wolfe, Chris Smith, Trent Franks, John McCain, Rick Santorum, and Sam Brownback for their efforts in passing legislative acts in support for democracy and liberty in the Middle East. CAIR and NIAC heavily savaged President Bush's speeches on Freedom Forward in the Middle East, deploying all the resources they had to block US support to liberal democrats in the region. Islamist lobbies in Washington are directly responsible for killing any initiative in the US Government to support Darfur, southern Sudan, Lebanon, the Kurds, liberal women in the Muslim world, and true democrats in the Arab world and Muslim Africa.

In the think tank world, CAIR and its allies aggressively attacked scholars who raised the issue of persecution against seculars or minorities in the Arab world and Iran. Among those attacked were Nina Shea and Paul Marshal from the Hudson Institute and the founder of an anti-slavery group, Dr Charles Jacobs, who was exposing the Sudan regime for its atrocities. Last but not least is the Islamists' relentless campaign to stirke at top scholars who advise Government and appear in the media to push for democratic liberation in the region. The vast and vicious attacks leveled against Professor Walid Phares—initially by CAIR's Nihad Awad and then widened by pro-Hezbollah and Muslim Brotherhood operatives online—has revealed to Arab and Middle Eastern liberal and seculars how ferocious is the battle for the Middle East in the US. Phares's books, particularly the latest one, The Coming Revolution: Struggle for Freedom in the Middle East (2010), hit the Islamist agenda hard by predicting the civil society revolts in the Middle East and then predicting how the Islamists would try to control them. Phares was attacked by an army of Jihadist militia online like no author since Samuel Huntington in the 1990s. As a freedom activist from the Middle East, Mustafa Geha, wrote, Phares is a hero to Muslim liberals. Along with dissidents, lawmakers, experts, and human rights activists, Phares is a force driving for a strategic change in US foreign policy towards supporting secular democracies in the region. This explains why the Islamists of America are fighting the battle for the forthcoming regimes with all the means they have.
Dr. Essam Abdallah is an Egyptian liberal intellectual who teaches at Ain Shams University and writes for the leading Arab liberal publication Elaph.

Syrian Children Join the Anti-Assad Revolution in Ma'arat al-Nu'man, Syria

By Sam Bazzi
February 16, 2012




Children from Ma'arat al-Nu'man, Idlib Governorate, Syria, joined the revolution against the Assad regime.


In this is video clip, posted by the Syrian opposition on YouTube, a girl standing among a group of about 20 children from Ma'arat al-Nu'man, a city in the Idlib Governorate, announced "We the children of Ma'arat al-Nu'man announce our defection from our schools and abandonment of our toys/games to join the Free [Syrian] Army and protect our people/families ― this after the whole world failed to protect or offer a helping hand to them."

The Free Syrian Army (FSA) is the main armed opposition group fighting against Bashar al-Assad's Alawite-dominated Iranian-allied Baathist regime. The FSA consists of defected Syrian Armed Forces personnel and civilians who have joined them.

The girl in the video further added, "The world should not blame us because we cannot sit cross-armed [idly] while we watch the blood of our people being spilled before our eyes. We have the right to defend our childhood, which was forsaken by the beastly al-Assad army."

The girl also condemned Russia for thwarting a United Nations resolution calling upon al-Assad to resign. Said she "And we say to Russia: our blood will not forgive you. Shame on you for supplying al-Assad with weapons, which are tearing our bodies. In light of the shameful international silence we have decided to carry weapons to protect our people and ourselves."

In reality, the FSA does not field child soldiers. These kids were only making a political appeal while carrying plastic toy guns and knives. They are in fact too young to be able to fire weapons. Obviously, their message is directed at their fellow Arabs from the Gulf countries and international sympathizers to entice them to help the Syrian Revolution.

The girl further added "We say to the dictatorial regime of Bashar: have you not had enough of our blood that you bomb us with tanks and artillery? You shall fall, you shall fall, like it or not, even if you bomb us with airplanes, for we are willing to sacrifice our lives for our defense and the victory of our revolution."

The message of the girl carried a very strong Islamic religious tone as she opened her announcement with a Quranic recitation: "And against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into the hearts of the enemies of God and your enemies." (Quran: 8:60)

The children concluded their video message with three collective invocations of "Allahu Akbar" ― Arabic for "God is Greater."

Indeed, God is greater than Bashar al-Assad, the Hezbollah terrorist Hassan Nasrallah and the Tyrant of Tehran Ali Khamenei ― all enemies of the Syrian Revolution and of freedom and liberty.

بشار: "إرحل عنا، ما بنحبك!"



To Bashar, from the children of Ma'arat al-Nu'man: "Leave us, we do not love you!"



Sam Bazzi is the director of the Islamic Counteterrorism Institute. He blogs at sambazzi.com
http://islamiccounterterrorism.org/story/syrian-children-join-anti-assad-revolution-maarat-al-numan-syria

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Is Iran Behind the Death of its Own Scientists?

By Emanuele Ottolenghi
Commentary Magazine
02.16.2012

The way attacks were conducted against the car of an Israeli diplomat’s wife in Delhi has contributed to an interesting, if disconcerting theory among pundits. Iran’s wave of attacks against Israeli targets is tit-for-tat against what are presumed to be Israeli-sponsored assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists inside Iran. Ian Black in the Guardian, for example, wrote two days ago that:

“The use in Delhi of a sticky bomb attached to an Israeli embassy vehicle by a man riding a motorbike seemed to mimic the modus operandi used by Israel’s agents in Tehran. Hints, surely, do not come much heavier than that?”

Black also refers to the Newsweek report that Michael Rubin and Jonathan Tobin also discussed, which suggested that Israel may be conducting false flag operations inside Iran by relying on the much-despised Mujahedin al-Khalq opposition group.

In short, the inference is that Israel had it coming and the Iranian intelligence operatives involved have a well-developed sense of humor, if they chose to use the same method Israeli proxies relied upon to kill Iranian scientists.

The likelihood of Israel conducting such operations inside Iran is, in fact, quite low. Israel has not had an intelligence presence inside Iran since 1979. Running an intelligence operation that can track down scientists in heavy morning traffic and disappear without a trace requires vast human resources. And Israelis, quite simply put, do not run false flag operations. Israel may have an interest in killing Iranian scientists – although Israel is not alone in that. But responsibility is also a matter of capabilities, not just presumed intentions.

Presuming Iranian responsibility for the Delhi, as well as the Tbilisi and Bangkok hits earlier this week, what then can we conclude about the use of the same technique – a magnet bomb stuck on the car by a passing motorcycle?

As Potkin Azarmehr, a brilliant Iranian blogger and journalist based in the UK suggests, the hand behind the assassinations in Iran may just as likely be the regime’s.

Potkin reviews the four hits and offers some useful insights on why the four individuals were unlikely to be targets for Israel but may have been likely targets for the regime:

1. Professor Ali Mohammadi, killed in front of his home by a booby-trapped motorcycle parked outside, was a public supporter of the Green Movement and a member of a regional science project to which Israeli scientists also participated. He taught quantum physics: “It stretches the imagination to assume the Islamic Republic of Iran would include one of its key nuclear weapon/power scientists, who could be a possible target for assassination by Western agencies, on this SESAME project, where he would regularly meet in conferences with colleagues from other countries, including Israel.” An assassin, Jamal Fash, was paraded on TV, but the “TV confessions of Jamali Fash were full of contradictions and it later emerged that he was an ardent pro-Ahmadinejad devotee and a kickboxer member of the national team.”

2. Professor Majid Shahriari, killed on November 29, 2010, was a member of the same regional project alongside Ali Mohammadi. Potkin notes that “There was no appeal made by the state for the public to come forward as witnesses and until now no one has been arrested or charged with his murder. I have come across one eyewitness myself however. A former employee of the interior ministry, who saw the whole thing and told me it bore all the hallmarks of an Iranian regime hit squad.”

3. Fereydoun Abbasi-Davani survived an attempt a few minutes after Shahriari was killed and was later appointed as head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran. This guy was clearly linked to the program but, as Potkin helpfully notes, “Footage of Abbassi Davani’s car shown afterwards, show a few bullet holes on the bonnet and windscreen and unlike Shahriari’s car, his car was not blown up. If these assassinations were the work of highly sophisticated Western/Israeli sent hit squads, how is it that a theoretical research physicist not on the sanctions list is eliminated so efficiently but the more obvious target who is clearly connected to the nuclear program and is on the sanctions list, is not even hurt?”

4. Dariush Rezaei Nejad was murdered as he waited for his daughter at kindergarten on July 23, 2011. He is the namesake of a nuclear scientist, but he himself was an electrical engineering master student. His Wikipedia entry tells us that “At the time of his killing he was described by officials as a ‘nuclear scientist’ and an academic associated with Iran’s atomic activities, but days later as a postgraduate electrical engineering masters student at Tehran’s K.N.Toosi University of Technology, who was waiting to defend his thesis.” Potkin weighed in on this by adding that “He even had a Facebook page and on his Facebook page, he had included the dissident Iranian singer, Shajarian, as one of his favorites. It is unthinkable that an Iranian scientist connected with Iran’s nuclear program would have a Facebook page which shared his friends and family and their photos.”

It is, of course, just a theory – although information extracted from the Iranian suspects arrested in Bangkok and Delhi may offer additional insights.

But killing its own expendable ordinary citizens – especially if they belong to the opposition or see no evil in participating in joint research projects with Israeli scientists – is in keeping with the Iranian regime’s moral standards. And given the similarity of the technique used, I at least am inclined to believe Iran had a hand in killing its own people and then spinning the murders for its propaganda war with the West.


http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/02/16/iran-death-of-scientists/

Iran as Victim? University of San Francisco's Stephen Zunes Thinks So

by Cinnamon Stillwell and Rima Greene
FrontPage Magazine
February 16, 2012


A crowd of would-be revolutionaries gathered last month at Revolution Books in Berkeley to hear Stephen Zunes—chair of the program in Middle Eastern studies and professor of politics and international studies at the University of San Francisco—speak on a panel with the improbable title, "U.S.-Israeli Assault on Iran Escalates: The Danger of War Grows." The title originated with an article by co-panelist Larry Everest, author and correspondent for Revolution, the newspaper for the Revolutionary Communist Party, USA, an organization whose cult of personality revolves around well-known Stalinist Bob Avakian. Fittingly, event posters on the walls sported slogans such as "Re-visioning Socialism" and "Another World is Possible," and the shelves were filled with books by Avakian and other communists.

Revolution Books inhabits a choice retail location just blocks from the University of California, Berkeley campus, and in contrast with other events featuring left-wing academics whose talks are assigned to students, the audience in this instance was largely middle-aged to elderly. Spanish speakers provided simultaneous translations in the rear seats, producing a continuous background hum, while a very casually dressed woman entered, radio to her ear, listening to President Obama's 2012 State of the Union address.

All who entered were handed a copy of Revolution along with a flier for International A.N.S.W.E.R.'s then-forthcoming "national day of action" in San Francisco, which trumpeted the do-nothing rallying cry, "No War on Iran, No Sanctions, No Interventions, No Assassinations!" Like the rally to come, the atmosphere at Revolution Books was fiercely anti-American, anti-Israel, and apologetic towards, even supportive of, the Iranian regime.

In a nod to the setting, Zunes proclaimed at the outset, "I'm not a communist," but his repetitive references to "imperialists" demonstrated his familiarity with leftist jargon. He elaborated: "A lot of what I'm going to say overlaps, but I am coming from a slightly different angle."

Affirming the contention of the preceding speaker, Larry Everest, that the Iranian regime had allegedly given up pursuing nuclear weapons in 2003 according to a 2007—and later discredited—National Intelligence Estimate, Zunes added, "No one who is intellectually honest could disagree with your analysis." Was International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director-General Yukiya Amano intellectually dishonest when he stated last month that the IAEA, "has credible information that Iran is engaged in activities relevant to the development of nuclear explosives"?

Zunes reiterated a position he took in a 2009 article—on the heels of Iran's stolen election—titled, "Why U.S. Neocons Want Ahmadinejad to Win":

What's important is that Neocons and the imperialists in this country want the green revolution crushed. They need each other to justify the kinds of policies the U.S. imperialists want.

This logic, such as it is, concludes that Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad provides a handy excuse for so-called warmongers in the U.S. to block the Obama administration's diplomatic overtures to Iran. Such a conspiracy theory ignores the fact that Neoconservatives and others on the right were strong critics of the Obama administration's refusal to offer moral support to the green revolution at its outset.

Zunes insisted that U.S. intervention only inspires the Iranian people to side with their government:

Everyone emphasizes the Islamic characteristics of Iran, but what's really kept the regime in power is nationalism. The Iranians are the most nationalistic people in the entire world . . . it's something the regime can capitalize on when it hears these threats [of sanctions]. What we don't hear in the media is that the opposition supports the government in its conflict with the U.S. They oppose U.S. intervention.

Yet dissident voices within Iran continue to express disgust with the regime and a lack of animosity towards the U.S. For instance, a young Iranian woman who corresponds regularly with American journalist Michael Yon recently sent him the following:

To make the long story short, people in Iran, not just youth, hate the government and want to move out of the country as soon as they can. . . . The Iranians do not hate you nor do they hate ur [sic] government. This is all the media. . . . No one is against you here except for those on the government's side.

Iranian exiles who were tortured in Iran's Evin Prison provided letters and live testimony at the UN Watch-organized event, "We Have A Dream: Global Summit Against Discrimination and Persecution," held in September, 2011 to coincide with the United Nations 66th Session of the General Assembly. To no avail, the organizers begged the international community to intervene.

Of such voices, Zunes had nothing to say, and he casually discounted Iranian exiles living in the U.S., many of whom fear for their lives:

There have been some U.S.-funded opposition groups. Most of these are tied to exiles who have virtually no support inside the country, no impact on uprisings . . . there have been all sorts of sordid interventions . . . you have a few wannabes in the exile community, particularly in L.A.

As for the Iranian regime's threats to annihilate Israel, Zunes blithely assured the audience that:

Iran is not going to nuke Israel. Get real. It's a repressive regime, but they are not suicidal. Israel has massive deterrents as does the US and other allies.

This would come as news to the Iranian mullahs, who are adherents to Mahdism, the apocalyptic belief in the return of the twelfth Imam who, at the end of times, will wage war against unbelievers and the forces of evil and establish a worldwide Islamic state. Might a nuclear conflict with Israel spark such a fanatical scenario? Zunes never raised the question.

Echoing a well-worn canard originated by University of Michigan history professor Juan Cole, Zunes claimed:

And by the way, Ahmadinijad, he's really hardcore, he's anti-Semitic, but he never said 'Israel should be wiped off the map.' That idiom doesn't even exist in Farsi. What he's doing is quoting Ayatollah Khamenei from twenty years ago. . . . What he said was the regime occupying Jerusalem should 'vanish from the pages of time'. . . . Ahmadinejad clarified that in a later interview. He's talking about a unified Palestine. He's not talking about killing the Jews . . . he's talking about regime change.

Zunes might want to consult Nazila Fathi of the New York Times Tehran bureau, who provided a translation of Ahmadinejad's October 26, 2005 speech at "The World Without Zionism" conference in Tehran—the source of the quote in question. His exact words were: "Our dear Imam said that the occupying regime must be wiped off the map and this was a very wise statement." In addition, and as noted by Iran expert Michael Rubin, "the Islamic Republic provides its own clarification. In its official translations, it headlined Ahmadinejad's call to 'wipe Israel off the map.'" The Iranian regime's genocidal incitement can been seen on propaganda billboards across the country and heard in countless statements from officials, including Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who recently called Israel a "'cancerous tumor that should be cut and will be cut." It doesn't get much clearer than that.

Zunes claimed that a potential attack on Israel is not up to Ahmadinejad because, as he put it, "He's not the commander-in-chief. It's up to the Guardian Council—a committee—and as a rule committees don't go for crazy provocative acts."

Apparently, a committee would never try to: assassinate a Saudi ambassador in Washington, D.C.; kill its own nuclear scientists for talking to the IAEA; use its proxy, Hezbollah, to blow up U.S. Marines barracks in Beirut; kidnap the entire U.S. embassy staff; bomb a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires; attempt to take over Lebanon; terrorize and assassinate Iranian dissidents in other countries; supply weapons to Hamas and Hezbollah; help train the 9/11 terrorists; nor order all Muslims worldwide to kill a writer for alleged blasphemy. Yet all of this was done in the name of the Khomeinist Islamic revolution.

Zunes referred to the current scenario in which Israel, according to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta's recent statement to the media, could attack Iran's nuclear facilities in the spring, by asking if,

Israel [would] do something on its own? Obama has made clear he would not tolerate that. You saw Eisenhower in 1956 . . . when it comes down to real important national security issues, Israel can't change U.S. policies. But even if they don't plan to go to war, we prepare and threaten war . . . it makes it difficult to stop.

In Zunes's mind, the U.S. and Israel are always the instigators of war, rather than the bellicose Iranian regime that has terrorized not only its own population, but much of the civilized world. He would do better to direct his closing call to "prevent another war in the Middle East" to Tehran.

Berkeley resident Rima Greene co-wrote this article with Cinnamon Stillwell, the West Coast Representative for Campus Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum. She can be reached at stillwell@meforum.org.


NB: If you wish to make your views known to the administration of the University of San Francisco, you may contact the office of the president, the Rev. Stephen A. Privett, S.J., at:
Telephone: (415) 422-6762
Fax: (415) 422-2303

The office of the board of trustees may be contacted at:
Tel: (415) 422-6712
Fax: (415) 422-2303


Original Post:

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Syrian Democratic Coalition: Syrian People are paying for Western inaction with their lives

Statement
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


Syrian People are paying for Western inaction with their lives
Obama administration needs to lead the world in providing direct aid to the Syrian people to stop the genocide in Syria

MEDIA CONTACTS:
Gregg Edgar
Gordon C. James Public Relations
602-690-7977


PHOENIX (February 14, 2012) – Dr. Zuhdi Jasser on behalf of the Syrian Democratic Coalition released the following statement regarding the escalating humanitarian crisis in Syria and the inability of the Obama administration to lead the world with a coherent strategy and action to directly aid the Syrian people in their quest for freedom rather than simply words:


“After over a year of demonstrations and over 7,000 Syrian men, women and children killed by Assad’s killing machine for simply wanting their freedom, it seems that there is no end in sight to the brutality of Bashar al-Assad and his military and no hope from the West or the UN for navigating a path forward for a Syria free of tyranny.

Bizarrely the United States and its western allies seem to be following the lead of the Arab League and its friends at the United Nations, cliques of autocrats often no better than Assad himself rather than lead free nations and immediately implement a clear strategy to end Assad’s regime. Britain’s foreign minister William Hague essentially took western intervention off of the table when he flatly stated ‘I don't see the way forward in Syria as being western boots on the ground in any form, including in any peacekeeping form.’ Few are actually calling for “boots on the ground” but a Kosovo style solution with targeted bombing of military facilities and armamentarium would have essentially the same impact it did against the Serbs for the Bosnians giving in this case the Free Syria Army room and momentum to gain position, time, and safe zones. Hague’s comments seem to rather reflect a raising of the white flag in the face of determined opposition from Iran, Russia, China, and of course Syria itself.

The US’s attempt to bring together “Friends of Syria” is admirable but only one component of what should be a far more forward and comprehensive strategy to bring down the Assad regime and help foster a genuine transition toward democracy. The paralysis of the US and the West due to a fear of what may come next, sentences the Syrian people to their current miserable condition and bloodshed at the hands of the Baathist butchers in control of the Syrian military. Any transition will be messy but let us not let fear of change become accomplices in a horrific genocide occurring in towns across Syria. In the last week alone the city of Homs has seen continued shelling of neighborhoods, daily death tolls in the hundreds and an attempt to smother a town into silence by cutting off food, water and electricity.

There is no excuse whatsoever in 2012 for massacres like Homs to occur with inaction from the US and the free world. Shortsightedness may paralyze our weak leaders but in the end once the Syrians have rid themselves of Assad and all of his corrupt military leaders enacting kill orders across their nation against their own people, they will not forget how little the US openly did inside Syria to counter the forces of evil in Syria. If we have any desire to bring liberty to Syria rather than see it become Islamist, American soft power and some hard power must be utilized or all the Syrian people will know is how we sat silent as Iran, Russia, China, and Hizballah armed the Syrian military and they were aided only by a few Arab League nations. This is not the American legacy our families came to the US knowing and loving.

A Kosovo style solution with bombing, military air support, black ops and intelligence support, humanitarian aid, border aid with safe zones, genuine economic isolation through comprehensive sanctions (in addition to sanctions against direct Syrian supporters ie. Russia, China, Iran, and Lebanon) is possible and the only genuine support that will be in any way meaningful to the Syrian people. Any other so-called support with repeated diplomatic meetings, delay tactics, empty statements at press conferences is empty and transparently useless. The Syrian people know who is coming to their aid and who is not.

When Jay Carney on the behalf of the White House stated last week that the ‘right solution is a political solution’ for Syria this demonstrates such a profound ineptness and inability to articulate and understand the evil that is Assad and his military leadership that the US has fallen to an all-time low in its reliability in defending liberty abroad.

American diplomacy has taken a tragic turn when it is the UN’s Ban Ki Moon who is advocating the loudest for the freedom seeking people of Syria. Strategically Syria represents our greatest opportunity against the Iranian crescent of control through Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. As an ethnically and religiously diverse nation Syria stands as the Arab nation ultimately most likely to arise out of both secular fascism and Islamist fascism.

Our inaction is being paid for with the lives of the Syrian people. The Security Council gridlock will do nothing to change the situation on the ground.  Russian Foreign Minister Sergey V. Lavrov told a news conference that ‘We should first have peace,’ before we agree to the Arab League proposal. Hypocritically the Russians are best suited to bring that peace by ceasing the arming and fueling of Assad’s military. The Syrian government does not make its own weapons. The United States needs to step away from the table at the UN and stop grasping at straws for a solution and seize the opportunity to lead for there to be any hope for change within the Middle East.”


About Syrian Democratic Coalition
The Syrian Democratic Coalition (SDC) is an emerging coalition of diverse Syrian organizations coming together to help bring an end to the Assad regime and promote the transformation of Syria into a secular democracy based in liberty... The coalition is founded upon a belief in the separation of religion from state and is dedicated to establishing a new constitution and transparent federal republic in Syria, based in reason that equally protects minority rights, promotes gender equality, and embraces the rights and liberties of every individual as enumerated in the United Nations Declaration for Human Rights. This growing coalition crosses all ethnic, religious and tribal lines to represent all Syrians.  It currently includes members of Save Syria Now!, the Kurdistan National Assembly of Syria, the Union of Syrian Arab Tribes and the Christian Democratic Movement.

####